Politics, Theology &
the
Destruction of the Meaning
of Words
A principal modus
operandi of Evil is the destruction of the very meaning of words.
Take, for example, the word
“black” in United States politics and the word “heaven” in
Christian theology.
Because of his policies,
President Clinton was sometimes (but without any generalized
ridicule) referred to by the “dragon” media in the United States
as the first “black” president...
Until, that is, the election
of resident—this is the only thing that can be said with
absolute certainty—Obama; who was then referred
to as the first “black” president (also, however, without any generalized ridicule).
But there is a problem:
The first generation
offspring of a black parent and a white parent is neither “black”,
nor “white”; but is referred to as a mulatto; a word that
the “dragon” media in the United States, similar to the movie
1984, ‘sent
down the memory hole’ and consigned to elimination
from the English language; purportedly because, however accurate, it is ‘offensive’.
Thus,
for the “dragon” media to say that resident Obama was the first
black
president
not only destroys the very meaning of the word “black”; it is
also fundamentally racist;
assuming a black racial supremacy
in the union of a black person and a white person; something that
would immediately
become obvious if a person were to be so brazenly racist
as to assert, instead, that, regardless of having a black father, resident Obama is white.
On
the contrary, regardless of what the “dragon” media asserts, a
black person is “black”; a white person is “white”; a
mulatto person is a “mulatto” person...
And,
by the way, a female person is “female” and a male person is
“male”.
(And,
in this context, it should also be mentioned that a quite
obvious
Reverse Speech recording of Obama’s campaign slogan, “Yes we can”,
was clearly discovered to be “Thank you, Satan”—something in which
the mainstream “dragon” media in the United States, however, had
NO
interest whatsoever.)
But
all of this nonsense
is mere child’s
play compared with Christian theology and its destruction of the meaning of the word
“heaven”:
In
his reply to the Sadducees, Jesus refers to the “angels in heaven”;
on the basis of which Pharisaical-metaphysical Christian theology
asserts that, in response to the question Jesus was asked, there is
“no marriage in heaven” because, after they die, there is no
further need for either procreation or sex; people becoming nothing
more than metaphysical entities without bodies flitting around in a metaphysical ‘space’ of either ‘heaven’ or ‘hell’...
All
of which, however, becomes ‘no longer operative’ when it comes to
interpreting the word “heaven” in the Revelation
of John.
In
Revelations
19:11-14,
for example, the first instance of the word “heaven” is
interpreted by Christian theology as “sky”—and
is assumed to be validated by Revelations
1:7 with regards to the “clouds of heaven”; whereas the second
instance of the word “heaven” in these passages (“..the armies
of heaven”) is interpreted by that very same theology as a
metaphysical ‘space’
rather than as the “sky”.
Nor
is it consistent to assert an astrological
significance
to the word “heaven” in Revelations
12:1; and, at the very same time, a metaphysical
significance
to the word “heaven” in Revelations
12:7-9
as descriptive of ‘the Fall’.
And,
it is on the basis of Christian theology’s absolute destruction of
the
meaning of
the word “heaven”—it means one thing in one passage, and its diametrical opposite in another passage—that tens or hundreds of millions of Christians
actually believe that, when Jesus returns, he will
literally
ride a literal
white horse out of the sky;
the phrase “every eye” in Revelations
1:7 often being distranslated
and replaced by the word “everyone””; although the “eyes”
referred to in this passage signify the Seven Churches, the seven
‘chakras’, or the seven principal ganglia of the sympathetic
nervous system which see
the Vision of the “Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven”
(Daniel
7:13—an event that, to my knowledge, NO
Christian
theologian has EVER asserted as having occurred in the “sky”.)
Thus,
on the contrary, the word “heaven” can have only ONE
meaning:
the ‘space’ in which a Revelation is received (something that I
have referred to as the “non-dualistic, 2-dimensional ‘flat’
space “observing consciousness”):
For
example, the Revelation of “the resurrection” and the memories of
previous lives; or the Vision of the “Son of man”/“Tree of
Life”/“Night Journey” itself.
Michael Joseph Cecil (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verses 97-98 & 285 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) for:
Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth Anne Cecil (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew) (1987) (7th Church) and:
Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000- (3rd Church)
Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth Anne Cecil (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew) (1987) (7th Church) and:
Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987) (6th Church)
(March, 1987—http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html )
Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986) (4th Church)
Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992) (5th Church)
Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987- (2nd Church)
Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970) (1st Church)
Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000- (3rd Church)
No comments:
Post a Comment