Translate

Friday, October 24, 2014

Wine And Wine Skins.
Stone And Sand.


The Christian religious authorities’ and their gullible followers simply disregard altogether the statements of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas about the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness—for example, “On the day when you were one, you became two”—on the grounds that it cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that those sayings are even authentic in the first place.

In fact, these religionists would much prefer that such Sayings of Jesus be universally disregarded as utterly meaningless rather than that they describe a crucial aspect of the Teaching of Jesus of which they have no Knowledge.

OK. Fine.

Disregard the Gospel of Thomas if you want.

But the Truth of the matter is that, even with regards to the canonical Gospels, these Christian religious authorities’ are utterly blind to the statements of Jesus descriptive of the ‘fallen’ consciousness; trivially (and ludicrously) misinterpreting them in accordance with the doctrines of Christian metaphysical idolatry.

Take, for example, ‘the foundation of stone rather than the ‘foundation of sand’, and the ‘new wine in old wine skins’ metaphors.

The ‘foundation of stone’ refers to the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection” rather than belief (even, especially, ‘belief in Jesus’ ); belief originating in the “beast of the earth” consciousness of the ‘thinker’ (which ‘thinks’ itself into existence rather than having been Created ‘by and in the image of God’); whereas the ‘old wine skins’ refers to the intrinsic inability of the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness to accommodate itself to that Knowledge; resulting in what the Jewish mystics refer to as the ‘shattering of the vessels’.

In other words, the Sayings of Jesus in, for example, the Gospel of Thomas, simply cannot be ‘finessed’ by the ‘fallen’ consciousness of the “self” or the ‘thinker’...

The Christian interpretive paradigm’s inability to explain the Gospel of Thomas corresponding to the inability of classical physics to explain the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-


Problem-Solving

No problem can be solved by the same level of consciousness that created it.” 

Albert Einstein

Problems created by the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness—that is, the “beast of the sea” consciousness of the “self” and the “beast of the earth” consciousness of the ‘thinker’—cannot be solved by the ‘fallen’ consciousness itself; but only by appealing to an entirely different ‘level’ of consciousness altogether beyond the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’; that is, the non-dualistic “observing consciousness” Created ‘by and in the image of God’.

Similarly, problems created by “the beast” political establishment and the “false prophet” monotheistic religious ‘authorities’—aided and abetted, of course, by the ‘agents’ of the “dragon” -media—cannot be solved by the very political, religious and media officials that created those problems (bound as they are by the memories, images, thoughts and knowledge of the dualistic ‘fallen’ consciousness itself); but only by someone operating from completely outside of the current “beast”/“false prophet”, political/religionist narrative...

Someone, perhaps, unknown to the political officials; but, certainly, held in contempt by the monotheistic religious officials.


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and


(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-



Sounds Familiar


Strange that the responses encountered by President Putin in his efforts to explain Russian foreign policy:


are similar to the responses encountered by someone trying to explain the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection”:

“No one wanted to listen to us, and no one wanted to talk to us.”

Of course not.

It appears that “civilized dialogue” is everywhere frowned upon—whether with regards to Russian foreign policy, or the lies and errors of the monotheistic religious authorities’ about the Doctrine of “the resurrection”—in favor of naked (and vicious) attempts to preserve and expand upon one’s power...

And regardless of the consequences in terms of the loss of human lives.


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-



Reducing Violence In Israel


To: Reuven Rivlin, President of Israel

From: Michael Cecil

Re: Diminishing violence in Israeli society

Sir:

I am writing in response to a recent article in which you acknowledged the problem of violence in Israeli society:


something which should also be understood in the context of the recent selection of two Chief Rabbis for Jerusalem; a selection which clearly demonstrated the intrinsic inability of the Jewish religious authorities’ (“A house divided against itself cannot stand.”—as Jesus said) to ameliorate in any way, much less resolve the problem of violence in Israeli society...

My fundamental question being “Are you serious?”


the very origin of this ‘disease’ in Israeli society is far beyond politics; and is to be found, instead, in the doctrines of Judaism, Christianity and Islam which specifically deny, distort and contradict the Revelations received by Moses, Isaiah, Daniel, Jesus and Mohammed...

The question being, of course, whether there is anyone in the “dragon”-media, anyone in “the beast” political establishment, or anyone in the “false prophet” monotheistic religious establishment in Israel (or, specifically, Jerusalem) who has the courageand is willingto “strike at the (theological and psychological) root” of this ‘disease’, rather than merely “hacking at the (political) branches”.

As Einstein once said, “No problem can be solved by the same level of consciousness that created it” in the first place.

And, because it is the consciousness (and the lack of Knowledge) of these “false prophet”, monotheistic religious ‘authorities’ which has created this ‘disease’ in the first place, they cannot be expected to have either the consciousness or the Knowledge required to cure the ‘disease’.


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-



Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Does He Have ANY
Knowledge of the Torah?

With regards to today’s election of the Chief Rabbis of Jerusalem:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Who-is-fit-to-be-chief-rabbi-of-Jerusalem-379346 ,

one question takes precedence over every other question:

Does he have ANY Knowledge of the Torah at all?

ANY.

Does he understand, for example, that Chapter 28 of
Deuteronomy necessarily implies a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’; later specifically taught by Isaiah, Daniel, Jesus and Mohammed as the Doctrine of “the resurrection”; the revelation of the memories of previous lives being figuratively described in Chapter 26, verse 19 of the Book of Isaiah, Chapter 27, verses 52-53 of the Gospel of Matthew, and Chapter 20, verse 36 of the Gospel of Luke?

Does he understand, for example, that the “Tree of Life” in Chapter 3 of Genesis is the same Vision referred to as the Vision of the “Son of man” in the Book of Daniel, the Gospels and the Revelation of John; the “Vision of Knowledge” in the Thanksgiving Hymns of the Dead Sea Scrolls; and the “Night Journey” and the “sidrah tree” in the Quran?

And does he understand that it is the denial and contradiction of ONE Revelation—the Revelation of  “the resurrection”by the Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious ‘authorities’ which is at the very foundation of the conflicts among (anti-Zionists/Zionists; Catholics/Protestants; Sunnis/Shi’ites) and between Jews, Christians and Muslims; transforming Jerusalem into a city of division, hatred, violence, bloodshed and mass-murder?

Anyone who is elected Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, but who lacks such Knowledge—“My people perish for lack of Knowledge”—is merely calling down the Vengeance of the Creator upon not only Jerusalem; but, also, the people of Israel...

In a close re-enactment of what happened almost 1900 years ago.


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-



Babble On, Theologians, Babylon

Babble, theologians, babble.

Babble on Babel.

Babble on theologians’ babblings...

Babbling on the Revelations babbled from Babel.

Babble on, theologians, babble on.

Babble on.

Babble on.

Babylon.



They have no Knowledge of the Revelations.

Thus, the Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious ‘authorities’ have created a belief system—but, in fact, what is nothing less than a modern day Tower of Babel (its “one language” being the repudiation of Revealed Knowledge)—from which it is asserted that the words of Moses, Jesus and Mohammed (and, for example, the Prophecies in the Book of Daniel and the Revelation of John) can easily have dozens, if not hundreds, of different—and often mutually exclusive—‘interpretations’; each one more ludicrous than the one that preceded it...

The ultimate consequence of which is that those Revelations and Prophecies are, in the final analysis, utterly meaningless.

Especially
to those who are paid to convey them.

Translation: Monotheism’s Tower of Babel does not acknowledge that the words of Revelation have any specific meaning at all—except, strangely enough, with regards to the universal repudiation of the Revelation of “the resurrection”; but, rather, that the ‘meaning’ of those words is determined exclusively by whatever is most pleasurable to each and every individual believer.

(Just imagine creating an arithmetic in which the number “4” has as many different meanings as do the “dragon”, “the beast” and the “false prophet” from Chapter 16, verse 13 of the Revelation of John.)

And it is this fundamental meaningless of the Revelations and Prophecies to the monotheistic religious ‘authorities’ and their followers—this license to believe whatever the believer wants those words to mean—which is then advanced monolithically, arrogantly and self-righteously against the assertion that the words of Revelation have, in fact, a very specific meaning; a meaning which, however, can be Revealed only by someone who has received the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection” (See Chapter 12, verses 9-10 of the Book of Daniel).


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-




Monday, October 20, 2014

Israel ‘Sick With Violence’

Of course it is; and not surprisingly:


But the “root” of this xenophobic and psychopathic violence is to be found not in politics, but in theology: the Jewish, Christian and Muslim religious ‘authorities’ determined, relentless and categorical failure/refusal to understand—see Chapter 12, verse 9-10 of the Book of Daniel—that the Doctrine of “the resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’; the immediate implication, of course, being that Jews are sometimes ‘raised from the dead’ as Arabs (Mohammed, for example), while Arabs are sometimes ‘raised from the dead’ as Jews (the apostle Peter, for example).

Moreover, this violence can be expected not only to continue—but, also, to escalate—just so long as the ‘agents’ of the academic, mainstream and ‘alternative’ “dragon”-media continue to prevent any serious conversation—“Do they know how to converse?” Of course not—of not only the Truth about the Doctrine of “the resurrection”; but, also, the multitude of lies, metaphysical fantasies and denials of reality which are based upon the contradiction of that Revelation.

The question, then, is whether Israeli society has the courage to “strike at the (theological) root” of this xenophobic and psychopathic violence; or whether, out of cowardice, Israelis will, instead, prefer self-immolation for the purpose of preserving the economic interests of the monotheistic religious ‘authorities’.

Thus, until the ‘agents’ of the “dragon”-media of Israel are willing to publish the Truth to the people of Israel, there should be no expectation that this situation will improve.



Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-