Follow by Email


Friday, August 12, 2016

The “Kingdom of Michael” & the
Fatal Errors and Deficiencies
of Islamic Eschatology

Although he is obviously a very intelligent man—with, however, an intelligence that derives not from merely academic study—Sheikh Imran Nazar Hosein has no understanding of the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man”.

Clearly, he has not received the Revelation of “the resurrection”; which includes the Revelation of the Memory of Creation, the Revelation of ‘the Fall’ from the non-dualistic consciousness Created by God into the dualistic consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’, and the Revelation of the memories of previous lives.

Nor does he appear to have any understanding at all either that Mohammed was Elijah and John the Baptist ‘raised from the dead’, or that the Michael mentioned in Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel is the same Michael as is mentioned in Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran.

And, because he has no understanding of these Revelations—nor, it appears, even a minimal acquaintance with the Prophecies of Daniel—there are a number of quite significant, even fatal errors and deficiencies in the following video:

which are in need of correction.

1) In time segment 0:08-3:15 of this video, he states that, in accordance with his understanding of Islamic eschatology (of course, I have no idea what his sources are), the Jews will return to Jerusalem; something which very clearly echoes the opening passages of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light:

“The sons of Levi, Judah and Benjamin, the exiles in the desert, shall battle them in...all their bands when the exiled sons of light return from the Desert of the Peoples to camp in the Desert of Jerusalem; and after the battle they shall go up from there (to Jerusalem?).”

But his assertion that “Gog and Magog” refers to the Western, Judaeo-Christian-Zionist alliance, European Jews and Western Christianity (but not Orthodox Christianity) which have helped the Jews return to Jerusalem, differs quite sharply from the way that term is used in Chapter 38 of the Book of Ezekiel; and, for the purposes of accuracy, should be replaced by, instead, the term “king of the South” from Chapter 11, verse 40 of the Book of Daniel.

2) In time segment 3:26-7:30 of this video, he accurately asserts a distinction between the “end of the world” and the “end of history”; but he has no understanding that the “end of the world” occurs with respect to the Revelations, and that the “end of history” pertains to events in the space-time reality.

The physical world of space and time is a function of the perceptions, sensations and images of the consciousness of the “self” and the thoughts consciousness of the ‘thinker’; significantly, simply ignoring the Prophecies of Daniel with regards to the “time of the End” (Chapter 11, verse 40 and Chapter 12, verse 9 of the Book of Daniel).

Thus, the “end of the world” does not consist of the literal annihilation of the space-time reality; but is, rather, what the Jewish mystics refer to as the “shattering of the vessels”; that is, the instantaneous, absolute and traumatic annihilation of the consciousness of the “self” and the ‘thinker’ which occurs immediately prior to both the Vision of the “Son of man” (“Night Journey” and “Sidrah Tree”) and the Revelation of “the resurrection”; during which ‘people coming out of their graves’ is a metaphor for the Revelation of the memories of previous lives. (And, thus, his implication that there is a metaphysical ‘heaven’ or ‘hell’ to which ‘souls’ go after the “end of the world” is based upon his failure to understand the Truth about “the resurrection” in the first place.)

In other words, this “end of the world” is precisely what Moses, Daniel, Jesus and Mohammed all experienced prior to their receiving of the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection”; and what every person in the future will experience prior to the receiving of these Revelations.

With regards to the Prophecies about the “end of history”, then, his assertion of the existence of a ‘true and authentic holy state of Israel’ has no foundation in any of the Revelations received by the prophets. Rather, in the same document that Prophesied the return of the Jews to Jerusalem—that is, the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light—there is mention of, instead, the “kingdom of Michael” (see Column XVII)

3) In time segment 7:37-10:50, his assertions about the “dajjal” or the “anti-Christ” are a convenient fiction, also asserted by Jewish and Christian eschatologists and religious officials, for the purpose of distracting Jewish, Christian and Muslim religionists from the fact that the metaphysical doctrines of the monotheistic religions are, in fact, contradictions of the Revelations.

In other words, such statements would more accurately be applied to the metaphysical doctrines of the monotheistic religions, as is what is signified by the term “false prophet” in Chapter 16, verse 13 of the Revelation of John; and, 

4) In time segment 10:59-14:40, his statements about the mission of the “dajjal” being to deceive are accurate; after which, however, he immediately shifts his attention to the deception of paper money in comparison to money of gold and silver—which, by the way, echoes a statement from another Dead Sea Scroll, 4Q529:

that is, “bring to me silver and gold”—which have an intrinsic value; suggesting that such deception is, perhaps, the “greatest accomplishment” of the dajjal.

In fact, the “dajjal” or the “anti-Christ” is the “false prophet” (Revelations 16:13) monotheistic religious establishment, whose “greatest accomplishment” is convincing the monotheistic religionists that there is NO difference between the monotheistic Revelations and the metaphysical doctrines of the “false prophet” monotheistic religious officials.

With regards to his statements about the conflict between “true Islam” and the “fake or impostor Islam” of ISIS, however, the term “Islam” is operationally defined as the metaphysical doctrines of Islamic theology with merely a veneer of Revelation.

Thus, what ISIS does not have is not “Islam” at all; but, rather, the Knowledge of Truth Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection” received by Mohammed.

Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verses 97-98 & 285 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and:

Sarah-->Elijah-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew(1987) (7th Church) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987) (6th Church)

(March, 1987— )

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986) (4th Church)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992) (5th Church)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987- (2nd Church)

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970) (1st

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-  (3rd 

Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

No comments: