Follow by Email


Saturday, July 2, 2016

Scientific Truth, Revealed Truth...
& the Murderous, Genocidal* ‘Agents’
of the “Dragon” Media

There were many reasons why Einstein’s 1905 paper on “The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” should never have been published in Annalen der Physik in the first place.

It had been written not by a university professor of physics; but, rather, by a lowly clerk in a patent office—who, moreover, had no previous history of publishing; the relationship between the title and the contents was merely fleeting or tenuous (thus suggesting a certain degree of intellectual sloppiness; something which, of course, is anathema to scientific discovery); much of it could legitimately be considered (and, for a while, was roundly ridiculed) as nothing more than ‘speculative philosophy’—a perception further supported by the fact that it contained no citations of current literature; nor could it be said that the person who chose to publish it fully understood the implications upon classical physics of what Einstein had written—for example, with regards to, ultimately, a new understanding of space, time, mass, energy and gravity.

But, nevertheless, Max Planck was sufficiently ‘intrigued’ with some of Einstein’s observations to set aside all of those considerations and to decide that, in any case, it should be published...

Thus initiating a revolution in physics, the universal publicizing and acceptance of the Special Theory of Relativity as a truly brilliant physical theory; and even, in a surprisingly short time—and to this day—international acclaim for Albert Einstein as, whether justified or not, the very personification of scientific genius (with which those acquainted with the discoveries of Nicola Tesla, Royal Rife, Max Gerson, or Stanslaw Burzynski might very well disagree, however).

And, while this example of the media’s response to scientific truth was to repeat almost 50 years later with the discovery of DNA, the response of the media to, on the other hand, Revealed Truth, has been disastrously and fatally different:

Over the past 40 years, thousands upon thousands of the officials of the media—editors and religion newswriters, for example—have been informed of the fulfillment of, in particular, the Prophecies in Chapter 11:40-45 and Chapter 12 of the Book of Daniel; the Knowledge Revealed through both the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection”; the research I have done on the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Codices; and/or the specific Visions and Prophecies I have personally received of the coming “time of trouble” (Michael being the name on my birth certificate); as well as, over approximately the past 9 years, my writings on the three dimensions of consciousness...

Probably 99.99% of whom never responded in any way and were not in any way interested.

But, then, there have been a very small number of media officials—possibly one of whom was a religion newswriter—who (cynically, as it turns out) have, at least for a very short time, expressed an ‘interest’ in obtaining more information...

At which point it has become glaringly obvious that, to someone in the media, the claim of having received Revelations or Prophecies requires a sharply different response than any claim of scientific discovery.

Whereas, at least in some circumstances, the claim of scientific truth is taken quite seriously by a journalist—and articles on scientific discoveries may very well be published in the media even if that information is not completely understood by the journalist—an entirely different set of rules applies when the matter involves Revealed Truth or Prophecy; the first of which is that that Revealed Truth (or Prophecy) must not exceed the intellectual capacity of that religion newswriter; thus resulting in its instantaneous rejection as either gibberish, or—much more likely—the product of psychosis

For what reason?

In order that it can be determined whether or not that information should even be published in the first place.

In other words, with regards to Revelation and Prophecy, the officials of the media become the official ‘gate-keepers’ or ‘Agent Smiths’ (from The Matrix) with the power to determine which information should be made known and which information should not be made known to the general public.

Translation: When it comes to Revelation and Prophecy, the role of the religion newswriters—who, it must be noted, have not read the writings of J. Krishnamurti for some 43 years; who have not conducted either 40 years of research on the Dead Sea Scrolls or 38 years of research on the Nag Hammadi Codices; who have not received any memories of previous lives someone—much less either the Vision of the “Son of man” or the Revelation of “the resurrection”; and who have not researched and written on the relationship between Revelation, metaphysical philosophy and consciousness for some 9 years—is to determine whether or not that information is, in fact, a Revelation received from God at all.

In other words, with regards to the discernment of Revealed Truth, it is perceived as the responsibility of journalists or religion newswriter to arrogate unto themselves the protection of literally everyone on earth from even so much as hearing information which, in the first place, may very well not be what it claims to be; in other words, information which may very well not be a Revelation at all.

At which point it is critically important to understand that one of the Prophecies of the 12th Chapter of the Book of Daniel is that “...these words will remain secret and sealed until the time of the End...”; and, furthermore, that “...the wicked will never understand; the wise will understand.”

In other words, according to the Prophecies of Daniel, the meaning of the very words of the Book of Daniel itself—for example, the descriptions of the Vision of the “Son of man” and the cryptic reference to “the resurrection” (in Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel)—will not be ‘unsealed’ “until the time of the End” and the appearance of someone with the name of Michael.

And it is at precisely this point that the offense to the ego of every religion newswriter and media official immediately becomes utterly unbearable.

Every religion newswriter, it must be understood—whether atheist or religionist—holds very firmly to the belief that he or she has a more or less complete understanding of both reality and Truth; to which only very minor or trivial additions will ever have to be made for the rest of their lives.


For the rest of their lives.

In other words, they are utterly impervious to any new information which, to any serious degree, conflicts with information they already have.

Thus, to be confronted with information which lethally challenges such a self-image—and, moreover, information which is specifically Prophesied as being sharply different than anything previously taught by the monotheistic religious officials—instantly triggers not only the psychological reflexes of self-preservation and denial...

But, also, the projection of an absolute evil upon the person who has conveyed that information.

Briefly, then, the reason why NO official of the media over the past 40 years has had any interest at all in the Revelations and Prophecies of which I have informed them is because such information challenges their belief that they are, for all practical purposes, ‘omniscient’...

Or, more bluntly, their secret—or sometimes not so secret—belief that they are ‘God’.

And, thus, the reason why so many millions of people have been slaughtered across the Middle East over these past 40 years—while the information that I have sent relentlessly to these media officials has relentlessly been ignored, censored and suppressed—is because such Truth is too much of an offense to their wretched “beast of the sea” consciousness of the “self”.

In other words, what has been going on these past 40 years is nothing less than human sacrifice...

Human sacrifice to the egos—or the “beast of the sea” selves—of not only the “dragon” media officials; but, also, the “beast” politicians and diplomats, and the “false prophet” monotheistic religious officials (Chapter 16, verse 13 of the Revelation of John).

All of which is a pre-emptive answer to those who, in response to the horrors of the coming “time of trouble” ask …


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verses 97-98 & 285 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and:

Sarah-->Elijah-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew(1987) (7th Church) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987) (6th Church)

(March, 1987— )

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986) (4th Church)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992) (5th Church)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987- (2nd Church)

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970) (1st

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-  (3rd 

Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

*Click on this page with your mouse to reveal the contents of the message.

No comments: