Follow by Email


Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Because They ‘Love’ Jesus...
Christians Hate His Teaching

According to the doctrines of Pharisaical-Greco-Roman metaphysical idolatry—d.b.a. Christianity, Inc.—Jesus, as ‘God’, was sacrificed (or, more accurately, tortured to death) as a “vicarious atonement for the sins of men”; thus enabling those who “believe on him” (whatever that means) to gain entry into an eternal metaphysical ‘heaven’.

All of which is said to be a direct consequence of the ‘unconditional love’ that the Creator has for humanity; that ‘unconditional love’ being looked upon as both a fundamental characteristic of the Divine as well as a supreme Moral value.

But what about the love that Christians say they have for Jesus?

Is it conditional or unconditional?

Obviously, the ‘love’ that Christians say they have for Jesus is absolutely conditional; that is, based upon the condition that he is a “vicarious atonement” for their sins; in other words, a free ticket into ‘heaven’; and, quite possibly, the ‘Rapture’ as well.

In other words, without the Christian doctrine of “vicarious atonement”, Jesus is merely one of several thousands of Jews crucified by the Roman almost two thousand years ago; in which case there is no particular reason that they should love him at all.

So, now there is a problem...

Because Jesus was not tortured to death as any “vicarious atonement for the sins of men”; but, rather, because his Teaching that “the resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’ constituted a serious threat to the pride, the wealth and the power of the Jewish religious establishment.

Thus, all Christians are confronted with a choice:

Will they believe that “the resurrection” is a Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’, as was the Teaching of Jesus...

Or, instead, will they choose to ‘love’ Jesus as a ‘vicarious atonement for their sins’?

More pointedly, will they be motivated by the desire for Truth; or, instead, will they be motivated by the desire to preserve the feeling that they ‘love’ Jesus?...

A feeling which originates in ‘fallen’, dualistic, “beast of the sea” consciousness of the “self”; is, of course, based upon a series of metaphysical lies, and has motivated the Christian religious officials to censor and suppress any information—for example, the Prophecies I have sent them of the coming “time of trouble”:

—for the purpose of preserving that feeling.

Thus, in the final analysis, it must be acknowledged that one of the major theological reasons for the fulfillment of the Prophecies of Chapter 11, verse 40 to Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel is the determined and unrelenting CONTEMPT of the “king of the South”, “false prophet” Christian religious officials and their followers of the Teaching of Jesus on “the resurrection; resulting in fatally flawed misinterpretations of the Prophecies of Daniel; and, thus, creating a situation requiring a military retaliation by the “king of the North” (Russia and its allies) against the “king of the South” (the United States and its allies).

Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verses 97-98 & 285 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and:

Sarah-->Elijah-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew(1987) (7th Church) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987) (6th Church)

(March, 1987— )

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986) (4th Church)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992) (5th Church)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987- (2nd Church)

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970) (1st

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-  (3rd 

Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

No comments: