Follow by Email


Saturday, December 5, 2015

Why Is the U.S. Media
Not Considered CULPABLE
For Terrorism in the United States?

Decisions are made by decision-makers on the basis of all available information.

It only stands to reason, then, that a decision that is based upon information which is patently false, inaccurate and incomplete—for example, the decision to ‘pledge allegiance’ to some evil, vicious (and ludicrous) ‘Islamic state’; or the decision to participate in some horrific act of violence in the name of religion—should differ sharply from a decision which is based, instead, upon information which is true, accurate and more complete.

And this is where the role of the media in perpetuating these acts of terrorist violence becomes crucial:

What institution is it that has relentlessly, unquestioningly—and without any possibility for rebuttal—perpetuated the illusion that Muslims are actually followers of Mohammed, and the Revelations he received, rather than followers of the DEATH cult doctrines of the Islamic theologians?

What institution is it that has witlessly and relentlessly repeated the LIE that those Muslims who die in ‘jihad’ will be given “72 virgins” when they get to a metaphysical ‘heaven’; when, in fact, the “companions” of believers are those with whom they have been associated, life, after life, after life, after they have been ‘raised from the dead’?

And what institution is it that has perpetuated the not-specifically-articulated, but unwarranted assumption that some purported ‘mahdi’ would actually approve of the policies of the ‘Islamic State’...

When, in fact, the Michael whose arrival is Prophesied in Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel—a Prophecy which, unbeknownst to these DEATH cult theologians, is validated by Sura 2:98 of the Quran—has relentlessly condemned not only their vicious and misogynist policies; but, also, their DEATH cult CONTRADICTIONS of the Revelations in the Quran?

Answer: The mainstream and ‘alternative’; secular and religious; print, broadcast and Internet MEDIA.

So, my questions, whenever I hear of such acts of terrorism in the United States, are the following:

What newspapers did the terrorists read?

What television news did the terrorists watch?

What news websites in the United States did the terrorists visit?

And how many opportunities were there for these terrorists to have been informed of the TRUTH about the Revelations in the Quran rather than the LIES of Islamic theology...

Were it NOT for the decisions of the newspaper editors, the television program directors, and the web-page managers to censor PRECISELY those Truths which may very well have PREVENTED those acts of terror from being committed in the first place?

Thus, I am constitutionally INCAPABLE of understanding why those media officials are not DIRECTLY responsible for these acts of terrorism...

And why, as of yet, they have not been PROSECUTED for “criminal negligence resulting in wrongful death”.

Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) for

Sarah-->Elijah-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew(1987) (7th Church) and:

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987) (6th Church)

(March, 1987— )

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986) (4th Church)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992) (5th Church)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987- (2nd Church)

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970) (1st

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-  (3rd 

Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

No comments: