Follow by Email

Translate

Monday, December 21, 2015

Politicians Can Provide No Solution
To the Islamic State

Barack Obama is, of course, trivially correct in his criticism of presidential candidate Donald Trump:


that he does not present any serious, relevant, minimally viable, or—much less—effective alternative to the policies of the current United States administration with regards to the Islamic State; concerning which I have already written:


But, at the same time, that’s like criticizing a cardiologist or a patent attorney for not having a solution to Fermat’s Last Theorem.

Why do all politicians appear to be ‘allergic’ to the assertion that, just as in every other issue which it is their responsibility to address and at least attempt to resolve, they are in desperate need of advisors with sufficient Knowledge of Revelation—not only the Revelations in the Quran:


but, also the Revelations in the Prophets, the Gospels and the Revelation of John—in order to be able to actually resolve the problem of ISIS and the Islamic State?

Now, with regards to health care, education, immigration policy, international trade, economic relations, and dozens of other issues of foreign and domestic policy, politicians cannot be expected to have all the answers; which is why, typically, they have dozens or hundreds of (paid) advisors who specialize in formulating such policies and in resolving the associated problems.

So, why does this not pertain when it comes to a consideration of the Revelations in the Quran, the lies of Islamic theology, and the (mysteriously?) continuing successes of the Islamic State?

How is the entire problem of Islamic terrorism—to say nothing of Zionist terrorism, or Christian-Zionist terrorism—‘magically’ assumed to be, somehow, within the ability of a politician to resolve ‘off the cuff’; that is, without any detailed research or serious consideration at all?

Why do none of these politicians, whether Republican or Democrat, have any advisors who have even a minimal comprehension of the fact that the metaphysical doctrines concocted by the Islamic (and Jewish and Christian) theologians are, in fact, a contradiction of those very Revelations which Jews, Christians and Muslims claim to believe...

And that the contradiction of those Revelations NECESSARILY establishes the doctrinal basis for not only Islamic terrorism; but, also, Zionist and Christian-Zionist terrorism?

In the final analysis, of course, it is not the advisors themselves who are capable of establishing policy and resolving problems; but, rather, the willingness of the individual politician to listen to those advisors.

Thus, I suggest that anyone who has ambitions of advising any presidential candidates, government officials, or other politicians with regards to the problems of the Islamic State, very carefully read the notes on this website and listen to the recordings on my 4Q529 YouTube channel.

Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) for

Sarah-->Elijah-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter 17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew(1987) (7th Church) and:

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987) (6th Church)

(March, 1987—http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html )

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986) (4th Church)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992) (5th Church)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987- (2nd Church)

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970) (1st
 Church)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-  (3rd 
 Church)






Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

No comments: