Follow by Email


Sunday, June 21, 2015

Secular Extremist Complicity
With Religious Extremist Violence

They are secular extremists.

But no one in the media is actually allowed to use such terminology, of course.

Because that would ‘blow their cover’.

They have a deep and abiding contempt for those who say that they ‘believe in God’; and, with their secular extremism, they have significantly infested academia and both the “dragon”-media and the “beast” political system; where, incredibly, they are the staunchly loyal and unwavering accomplices—before, during and after the fact—of those who perpetrate religious violence. (Thus, they are the witting or unwitting accomplices of Zionist violence, the violence of the Islamic State and Boko Haram, and the violence perpetrated by the military of the United States and other countries.)

To them, belief in God is nothing more than superstition.

To them, theology is nonsense (demonstrating that even a stopped clock is right twice a day).

And, even when confronted with emphatic and relentless claims of specifically theological motivations for violence; their response to what they consider to be nothing more than either a delusion or a bald-faced lie is, typically: “How quaint. But the real motivation simply had to have been either political or economic. Surely, sociology or abnormal psychology provides a much better explanation for that behavior than any theological ‘explanation’. Thus, theology can safely be ignored as not being in any way relevant (really?) to a religious conflict.”

This is the ‘mentality’ that has dominated every national and international conference on violent extremism that has been covered by the media or the Internet over the past year: the desperate and relentless pursuit of any ‘explanation’ other than a theological explanation; all of which, of course, is considered to be a quite ‘objective’ analysis of the problem; when, in fact, it is nothing less than a secular extremist analysis. (But, to the media,of course, there is only religious extremism. Secular extremism simply does not exist.)

In other words, the secular extremists are precisely as emphatic in their denial of—and precisely as blind to—the reality of theological motivations as the religious extremists are in their denial of, and blindness to the reality of previous lives:

And, because theological explanations simply have
no reality for them in the first place, they are intrinsically incapable of even seeing the problem of religious violence.

And, then, they are ‘surprised’ that they are incapable of
resolving that problem.

The difficulty for this civilization, then, is that the Way between the Scylla of religious extremism and the Charybdis of secularism extremism is narrow indeed...

While those at the helm appear to be steering an ultimately fatal corkscrew wake between the two.

Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

Sarah-->Elijah-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth (Chapter 12, verse 13 of the Book of Daniel and Chapter 11, verse 14 & Chapter17, verses 10-13 of the Gospel of Matthew) for:

Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982-1987)

(March, 1987—the

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-

Skype ID: deadseascrolls12

No comments: