Follow by Email

Translate

Friday, October 24, 2014

Wine And Wine Skins.
Stone And Sand.


The Christian religious authorities’ and their gullible followers simply disregard altogether the statements of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas about the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness—for example, “On the day when you were one, you became two”—on the grounds that it cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that those sayings are even authentic in the first place.

In fact, these religionists would much prefer that such Sayings of Jesus be universally disregarded as utterly meaningless rather than that they describe a crucial aspect of the Teaching of Jesus of which they have no Knowledge.

OK. Fine.

Disregard the Gospel of Thomas if you want.

But the Truth of the matter is that, even with regards to the canonical Gospels, these Christian religious authorities’ are utterly blind to the statements of Jesus descriptive of the ‘fallen’ consciousness; trivially (and ludicrously) misinterpreting them in accordance with the doctrines of Christian metaphysical idolatry.

Take, for example, ‘the foundation of stone rather than the ‘foundation of sand’, and the ‘new wine in old wine skins’ metaphors.

The ‘foundation of stone’ refers to the Knowledge Revealed through the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection” rather than belief (even, especially, ‘belief in Jesus’ ); belief originating in the “beast of the earth” consciousness of the ‘thinker’ (which ‘thinks’ itself into existence rather than having been Created ‘by and in the image of God’); whereas the ‘old wine skins’ refers to the intrinsic inability of the ‘fallen’, dualistic consciousness to accommodate itself to that Knowledge; resulting in what the Jewish mystics refer to as the ‘shattering of the vessels’.

In other words, the Sayings of Jesus in, for example, the Gospel of Thomas, simply cannot be ‘finessed’ by the ‘fallen’ consciousness of the “self” or the ‘thinker’...

The Christian interpretive paradigm’s inability to explain the Gospel of Thomas corresponding to the inability of classical physics to explain the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment


Michael (Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel, Sura 2, verse 98 of the Quran, Column XVII of the Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light & Chapter 3, verse 12 of the Revelation of John) and

(Seven Women, Seven Churches and Seven Sisters )

Sarah-->Elijah-->Daniel-->John the Baptist-->Mohammed-->Elizabeth
(my wife) for:

Hagar-->the apostle Mary-->Danielle (1982)

(March, 1987—the
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap960705.html)

Isaac-->the apostle John-->Robin (1986)

Ishmael-->the apostle Peter-->Cindy (1992)

Jacob-->the apostle Thomas-->Linda (1987-

Esau-->the apostle, Judas-->Susan (1970)

Isaiah’s wife-->the apostle James-->Kimberly (2000-


No comments: